Sustainable nickel enabled by hydrogen-based reduction

NATURE · ARTICLE · 30 APRIL 2025

U. Manzoor¹  ·  L. Mujica Roncery²  ·  D. Raabe³  ·  I. R. Souza Filho¹

¹ Max Planck Institute for Sustainable Materials, Düsseldorf, Germany

² Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia, Tunja, Colombia

³ Institut Jean Lamour, CNRS (UMR 7198), Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France

Open access (CC BY 4.0) · Received 16 February 2024 · Accepted 14 March 2025 · DOI 10.1038/s41586-025-08901-7

Nickel is a critical element in the shift to sustainable energy systems, with the demand for nickel projected to exceed 6 million tons annually by 2040, largely driven by the electrification of the transport sector. Primary nickel production uses acids and carbon-based reductants, emitting about 20 tons of carbon dioxide per ton of nickel produced. Here we present a method using fossil-free hydrogen-plasma-based reduction to extract nickel from low-grade ore variants known as laterites. We bypass the traditional multistep process and combine calcination, smelting, reduction and refining into a single metallurgical step conducted in one furnace. This approach produces high-grade ferronickel alloys at fast reduction kinetics. Thermodynamic control of the atmosphere of the furnace enables selective nickel reduction, yielding an alloy with minimal impurities (<0.04 wt% silicon, approximately 0.01 wt% phosphorus and <0.09 wt% calcium), eliminating the need for further refining. The proposed method has the potential to be up to about 18% more energy efficient while cutting direct carbon dioxide emissions by up to 84% compared with current practice. Our work thus shows a sustainable approach to help resolve the contradiction between the beneficial use of nickel in sustainable energy technologies and the environmental harm caused by its production.

 

Key numbers

  • 6 Mt/yr — projected Ni demand by 2040, doubled from 3 Mt today
  • ~20 t CO₂ per ton of Ni in current practice — ten times the emission of a ton of steel
  • −84% — potential cut in direct CO₂ emissions with hydrogen-plasma smelting reduction
  • +18% — potential energy savings versus the rotary kiln–electric furnace route
  • 1 step — calcination, smelting, reduction and refining merged into one furnace

 

Nickel is a strategic, hard-to-replace element: 1.97 million tons of stainless steel and 210 kilotons of non-ferrous alloys — especially superalloys — are made with it every year. But the batteries that will electrify transport need another 3 million tons by 2040, doubling global demand to 6 million tons per year.

The supply base is the wrong shape for this demand. Today 60% of annual nickel production comes from high-grade sulfide ores (1.5–4 wt% Ni), whose chemically simple minerals (NiS, Ni₃FeS₂, (Co,Ni)₃S₄) separate cleanly by froth flotation. The remaining 40% comes from low-grade laterites — saprolite and limonite, averaging 1.5 wt% Ni. In laterites there are no discrete Ni minerals: Ni²⁺/Fe²⁺ ions sit dissolved in complex magnesium silicates such as lizardite (Mg,Fe,Ni)₃Si₂O₅(OH)₄, or partially replace iron in goethite (Fe,Ni)OOH. Yet 60% of all land-based nickel reserves are locked in these laterites, and only 40% in sulfides (Fig. 1b).

Processing laterites is punishing. The energy demand runs from 230 to about 570 GJ per ton of Ni — far above the 22 GJ needed for steel. Emissions follow: the rotary kiln–electric furnace (RK-EF) and blast-furnace route emit about 45 t CO₂e per ton of Ni, high-pressure acid leaching (HPAL) about 14 t, pushing the industry average to 20–27 t CO₂e per ton — over ten times steel (2.3 t). Nickel is one of the most environmentally damaging metals to produce (Fig. 1c).

 

Fig. 1 | Integrated overview of the production of Ni from its natural ores. The market growth, sources, production, processing routes, emissions and comparison with the sustainable one-step hydrogen-plasma route. a, Current and projected (2040) Ni-market Fig. 1 | Integrated overview of the production of Ni from its natural ores. The market growth, sources, production, processing routes, emissions and comparison with the sustainable one-step hydrogen-plasma route. a, Current and projected (2040) Ni-market

 

 

Instead of drying, calcining, smelting and refining in sequence, the whole dried ore charge is melted and reduced at once — hydrogen-plasma smelting reduction (HPSR) — in a single electric arc furnace (Fig. 1d).

Solid-state direct reduction with gaseous hydrogen has been tried, but the crystallographic complexity of laterites, the low Ni content (0.5–2 wt%) and up to 90% impurity oxides make the kinetics sluggish and the hydrogen utilization inefficient, and demand additional pre- and post-treatments. Direct reduction of saprolites is scarcely reported: their silicates are too thermodynamically stable at typical reduction temperatures (800–1,000 °C).

HPSR sidesteps that stability problem by melting first. In the molten state the crystal structures dissociate into ionic species — Fe²⁺, Ni²⁺, Mg²⁺, O²⁻, SiO₄⁴⁻ — without catalysts, and the melt is exposed to highly reactive hydrogen-plasma species (H₂, H and H⁺). Calcination, smelting, beneficiation, metal separation and refining collapse into one metallurgical step, operable entirely on renewable energy: renewable electricity replaces carbon-based fuels, and sustainably produced hydrogen replaces carbon- and sulfur-based reductants — eliminating direct CO₂ and SO₂ emissions and the acids used in HPAL.

In the experiments, ore fines were compacted into ~10 g green pellets, placed on the water-cooled copper hearth of an arc-melting furnace, and reduced for 2 min by a 200 A plasma arc in Ar–10% H₂ at 900 mbar. Even this brief exposure precipitated pure metal droplets.

 

Fig. 2 | Unveiling phase transformations. The complex Ni-hosting mineral structure in the original ore, reduction mechanisms and a visual snapshot of a solidified sample. a, Phase evolution during melting of the original ore in Ar and a lean H₂ atmosphere Fig. 2 | Unveiling phase transformations. The complex Ni-hosting mineral structure in the original ore, reduction mechanisms and a visual snapshot of a solidified sample. a, Phase evolution during melting of the original ore in Ar and a lean H₂ atmosphere

 

Melted in argon alone, the ore solidifies as olivine (forsterite, Mg₂SiO₄, ~86 wt%) and pyroxene (MgSiO₃, ~10 wt%) — no Ni-rich phase at all. Nickel is dissolved in the silicates, confirmed by SEM–EDX mapping. The as-received ore loses ~23 wt% above 1,600 °C: moisture, dehydroxylation of serpentine minerals and decomposition of goethite to haematite.

The reduction mechanism is oxygen extraction, not direct attack on silicate. Free oxide ions (O²⁻) diffuse to the arc–melt interface and are taken by hydrogen-plasma species as water vapour or hydroxyl radicals. Each oxygen leaves two electrons behind, and those electrons are consumed preferentially by the cation with the lowest oxygen affinity — Ni²⁺, precipitating first, followed by Fe²⁺. The two metals form a homogeneous molten phase that solidifies into a single Fe–Ni alloy (Fig. 2c).

After just 2 min the metal has fully separated from the silicate melt — driven by a factor of two to three in density — and can simply be hammered out: ~5 mm nodules embedded in the unreduced slag, or 1–3 mm particles at the sample bottom (Fig. 2d).

 

 

A narrow thermodynamic window

Equilibrium calculations (ThermoCalc) for molten ore at 1,600 °C exposed to Ar–10% H₂ show that metal precipitation begins only after roughly 20% oxygen removal — and that first 20% is lost thermally, without any hydrogen. Beyond that point, grade and recovery trade off sharply: a narrow interval of 20.7–21.3% oxygen removal yields 70–90 wt% Ni ferronickel at 60–90 wt% recovery (Fig. 3a). Pushing past it feeds the alloy with iron and starves it of nickel.

The microstructure confirms the picture. Small droplets that solidified before coalescing act as micro-labs of the earliest reduction: one analysed at 97.3 wt% Ni, 0.44 wt% Fe and 2.22 wt% O — right in the calculated selective-precipitation range (Fig. 3d). After 2 min, 55 wt% of the ore's Ni was recovered as 52 wt% Ni alloy; after 4 min the alloy fell to 42 wt% Ni (74 wt% recovery) — the signature of Fe enrichment. Re-reducing the leftover silicate gave an alloy of only 9 wt% Ni and 90 wt% Fe.

 

Atmosphere control beats exposure time

A second ore (Ni ore 2, 1.57 wt% Ni, 16 wt% Fe) was reduced in two 2-min steps to test whether the leaner atmosphere in step 2 can hold grade without sacrificing recovery (Fig. 4):

Protocol (Fig. 4)

Step 1 — 2 min, Ar–10% H₂

Step 2 — 2 min

Combined alloy

a — uncontrolled step 2 (Ar–10% H₂)

61 ± 3 wt% Ni · 46 ± 1.3% recovery

12.7 ± 0.6 wt% Ni · 19 ± 3% recovery

29.33 ± 0.27 wt% Ni · 65.0 ± 5.0% recovery

b — controlled step 2 (Ar–2.5% H₂)

61 ± 3 wt% Ni · 46 ± 1.3% recovery

44.7 ± 0.6 wt% Ni · 18.3 ± 0.3% recovery

55.30 ± 0.23 wt% Ni · 64.60 ± 0.83% recovery

 

Same 4 min of processing, same recovery — but nearly double the grade when the step-2 atmosphere is kept H₂-lean. The authors note the sequence need not be stop–start: in practice the furnace can run continuously, as in conventional EAF operation, with gas composition adjusted on the fly and the remaining slag cycled through to recover residual Ni (a further 4 min in Ar–2.5% H₂ tapped 10 wt% Ni, lifting total recovery to 78 wt%).

 

Emissions and energy: where the gains come from

In the RK-EF route, 87.7% of all CO₂ falls on primary extraction — rotary dryer, rotary kiln and electric furnace — while mining and ore preparation contribute only 4.4% and 6.6% (Fig. 5c). The pre-treatments also eat 57% of the process energy (rotary dryer ~15%, rotary kiln ~42%), of which only ~27% is actually needed to run the chemistry: the rest leaves as flue gas, heat lost in material transfer (calcined ore cools from 880 to 400 °C before the furnace) and dust (Fig. 5d).

HPSR deletes that loss chain. The dried ore goes straight into the arc furnace on renewable power; the H₂/H₂O off-gas can heat the dryer, with unreacted H₂ combusted for extra heat or recirculated after dust filtration and water condensation. The result: up to ~18% lower energy consumption and an 84% cut in CO₂ emissions, assuming renewable electricity and green hydrogen.

And the by-products have homes. The ~30% Ni ferronickel feeds stainless steel, Invar and magnet alloys without energy-intensive refining; the Mg-silicate slag can go into bricks, roads and cement — or be refined for cosmetics. For scale-up, the paper points to established EAF practice: short high-current arcs, more electrodes, electromagnetic stirring and bottom gas injection to keep free oxygen reaching the arc–melt interface, plus the natural drop in melt viscosity as complex silicates simplify. A detailed cost analysis in the supplementary information reports a positive financial outcome.

Fig. 3 | Evidence of optimal thermodynamic compositional interval for high-grade ferronickel production, a solidified sample and microstructure of the metallic droplet. a, Thermodynamic calculation illustrating the variation in 'Ni/Fe recovery' (the ratio Fig. 3 | Evidence of optimal thermodynamic compositional interval for high-grade ferronickel production, a solidified sample and microstructure of the metallic droplet. a, Thermodynamic calculation illustrating the variation in 'Ni/Fe recovery' (the ratio
Fig. 4 | Tracking both Ni grade present in the Fe–Ni binary product alloy and recovery degree. a,b, Experimental protocol for a two-step experiment designed here to emphasize the significance of proper atmosphere control over the reduction time. In a, the Fig. 4 | Tracking both Ni grade present in the Fe–Ni binary product alloy and recovery degree. a,b, Experimental protocol for a two-step experiment designed here to emphasize the significance of proper atmosphere control over the reduction time. In a, the
Fig. 5 | Comparative analysis of CO₂ emissions and energy efficiency in traditional RK-EF route and HPSR alternative. a, Different steps involved in the traditional RK-EF route. b, HPSR as a one-step processing alternative to RK-EF. c, Comparison of CO₂ e Fig. 5 | Comparative analysis of CO₂ emissions and energy efficiency in traditional RK-EF route and HPSR alternative. a, Different steps involved in the traditional RK-EF route. b, HPSR as a one-step processing alternative to RK-EF. c, Comparison of CO₂ e
Druckversion | Sitemap
© D. Raabe